?

Log in

Today, for the first time in a long time, I tried to comment in… - The Entertainers [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
The Entertainers

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Feb. 20th, 2005|09:54 pm]
The Entertainers

tehentertainers

[joffy]
Today, for the first time in a long time, I tried to comment in theentertainers. I don't know whether they banned me (I don't think they have) - that was all a lie. Okay? But today i tried to comment - they have disabled anonymous comments AND non-friend posting. WTF! That goes against what had been set out in this post: http://www.livejournal.com/community/theentertainers/84259.html?mode=reply
"Everyone has posting access. Reviewers are not the sole people that can make a post."
So I guess that's why they deleted all my posts before they made it through "moderator approval".

Not only that, but it screams out "please no trolls!"
thejoffy (9:53:17 PM): if they can't even take outsiders commenting then they lose automatically
discephaloid (9:54:22 PM): Haha, fuck yes.
discephaloid (9:54:30 PM): ":-( plz no trolls :-("


I just feel sad for them, alone, without me, without any trolls whatsoever. What fun is that?
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: mengus
2005-02-20 06:04 pm (UTC)
joffy how will you counterpunch?

You state facts. What is your solution?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: joffy
2005-02-20 09:12 pm (UTC)
i have no solution because i care very little.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mengus
2005-02-20 09:16 pm (UTC)
If by very little you mean that you won't create mock communities with mock posts.

But then again, your interest may have waned.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: joffy
2005-02-20 09:18 pm (UTC)
i care to mock them but i don't care to get back in that community.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mengus
2005-02-20 09:19 pm (UTC)
Aye, it's not exactly exciting.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: joffy
2005-02-20 09:22 pm (UTC)
exactly. that's the point. it's not exciting there without my interest.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: sahara_dreams
2005-02-20 09:52 pm (UTC)
AIM
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: joffy
2005-02-20 10:00 pm (UTC)
EXACTLY. he's what's not exactly exciting.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mengus
2005-02-21 01:54 pm (UTC)
both de-friended
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: joffy
2005-02-21 10:34 pm (UTC)
you defriended ghostlight?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mengus
2005-02-21 10:43 pm (UTC)
No, neither, but it was funny for a second.

NOT as funny as this, however: http://www.livejournal.com/community/theentertainers/87130.html?view=2131802#t2131802
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: joffy
2005-02-21 10:47 pm (UTC)
i don't get it. how is a nasty review post in a community that is afraid of trolls and protects itself from outsider comments and drama funny?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mengus
2005-02-21 10:54 pm (UTC)
Because you still have not done your job in showing me what true funny is?

I am completely tickled pink by the flame war, so I'm sorry if you are not amused. I just figured you would be.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: joffy
2005-02-21 10:57 pm (UTC)
that is a flamewar? with just you an ashcanprobably? i am sorry but having a fight with one guy in a protected community, LET ALONE WITH ASHCAN, does not consitute a flamewar. he is so bad, all he can do is say "i am smart. ban him."
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ghostlight
2005-02-25 02:29 am (UTC)
He didn't even do so well at the "i am smart" bit.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: joffy
2005-02-25 03:27 am (UTC)
well, the banning plea already cancelled out the smart bit, but even if not, you're right.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)